| Sign In/My Account | View Cart |
A new release of Ant is just around the corner, so it's a good time to introduce one of the coolest new features that Java developers will soon be able to play with: antlibs. These are a better way for Java developers to create and distribute custom Ant tasks, types, and macros, and a much better way for the Ant developers to distribute the optional tasks included with the Ant distribution.
So, what was wrong with normal taskdefs that desperately needed
to be fixed?
taskdef classes--people still have
problems getting JUnit to work properly with Ant.Antlibs help to alleviate these problems:
If you already have an antlib, it can be used in a build file in
a few different ways. Use <typedef
file="example-antlib.xml"/> if the antlib is just a
directory of classes and an example-antlib.xml descriptor. This
is the most similar to a normal external Ant task.
Another approach is to use:
<typedef resource="com/mycompany/ant/example-antlib.xml"
uri="example:/mycompany.com"/>
This is appropriate if the antlib is a .jar file of classes and
the antlib descriptor. This can then be used with an xmlns
declaration as follows:
<example:task xmlns:example="example:/mycompany.com">
...
</example>
This assumes that there's a task called task
defined in the example-antlib.xml file.
Finally, there's the most convenient way of using antlibs. If the following conditions are met, Ant will automatically load all definitions of tasks and types declared in the antlib:
<project xmlns:example="antlib:com.mycompany.ant">
<target name="test">
<example:task/>
</target>
</project>
Before we start creating our own antlib, let's ask ourselves:
what exactly is an antlib, and what are the ingredients of one? To
begin with, an antlib is simply a collection of classes bundled
with an XML descriptor file. Typically, an antlib is distributed as
a .jar file, but this isn't a strict requirement. The root element
of the XML file is <antlib>. Any classes can go
into the makeup of an antlib, but only some classes can be declared
in the antlib.xml file. The following are allowed to be
declared in the antlib.xml:
<typedef><taskdef><macrodef><presetdef><scriptdef>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.AntLibDefinitionSo now that we have an idea of what goes into an antlib, let's get our hands dirty and make one.
Let's start with a simple goal: wrap a command-line executable to
give us a nicer interface than <exec>. For this
I've decided to pick one of the many open source version control
systems, Arch.
First, let's get Arch installed (if it isn't already): find the
correct package for your system and follow the install instructions.
Finally, type tla help and you should see something
similar to Figure 1.

Figure 1. GNU Arch installed
For Ant tasks that wrap around a command-line tool, a good
starting point is to build a base class that handles the main
setup of the environment, and then create a subclass for each
command you want to support. For example, the Ant SVN library has
an AbstractSvnTask, and then a Svn task
that handles any commands, along with SvnRevisionDiff
and SvnTagDiff, which are specialized for performing
the svn diff command.
Because GNU Arch is a similar tool to Subversion (ignoring the whole
distributed versus client/server argument here), the same strategy
of writing a base class and then creating specialized subclasses
should work just as well. The only problem is that the Ant
Svn doesn't (yet) ship with ant.
However, we don't need to re-invent the wheel, since Ant already
contains a task for CVS,
which behaves in an identical manner to the Svn task
(indeed, the Svn task was modeled closely on the
Cvs task). It also wraps a command line tool and it
deals with version control, an almost perfect fit!
With the strategy of "baseclass + specialized subclasses" chosen, and an example to model our code on, we can start writing our antlib.
Because we are creating an antlib, we should put the code in a
separate Java package/namespace; indeed an entirely new project
seems appropriate here. I'm using Eclipse, but the choice of IDE (or to even use an IDE) has no bearing on the way an antlib is developed.
For our package, I've decided on org.apache.ant.tla,
and following the example of the AbstractCvsTask, I'm
naming my base class AbstractTlaTask.
The most important part of the code is shown below, the
runCommand() method; all of the other code in
AbstractTlaTask sets the environment up before calling
this method to actually perform the work. It isn't essential for
all antlibs to have a runCommand() method, but in our
case, as we have to interface with a command-line tool, this is one
way to achieve that level of interaction, which works well with the
AbstractCvsTask. As you can see, when executing system
commands we have to deal with a lot of potential
Exceptions. Check out the sample
code to see the full source of this Task.
protected void runCommand(Commandline toExecute)
throws BuildException {
Environment env = new Environment();
Execute exe = new Execute(
getExecuteStreamHandler(), null
);
exe.setAntRun(getProject());
exe.setCommandline(
toExecute.getCommandline()
);
exe.setEnvironment(env.getVariables());
try {
String actualCommandLine =
executeToString(exe);
log(
actualCommandLine,
Project.MSG_VERBOSE
);
int retCode = exe.execute();
log(
"retCode=" + retCode,
Project.MSG_DEBUG
);
if (failOnError &&
Execute.isFailure(retCode)) {
throw new BuildException(
"tla exited with error code "
+ retCode
+ StringUtils.LINE_SEP
+ "Command line was ["
+ actualCommandLine + "]",
getLocation()
);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
if (failOnError) {
throw new BuildException(
e, getLocation()
);
} else {
log(
"Caught exception: " +
e.getMessage(),
Project.MSG_WARN
);
}
} catch (BuildException e) {
if (failOnError) {
throw (e);
} else {
Throwable t = e.getException();
if (t == null) {
t = e;
}
log(
"Caught exception: " +
t.getMessage(),
Project.MSG_WARN
);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
if (failOnError) {
throw new BuildException(
e, getLocation()
);
} else {
log(
"Caught exception: " +
e.getMessage(),
Project.MSG_WARN
);
}
}
}
Pages: 1, 2 |